• Log in
  • [[Fhs/fs/1/index.html|File:Freotopia fhs fs .. .. img banner.jpg]]

    [[../../../../index.html|Freotopia]] > [[../../../../society/index.html|FHS]] > Fremantle Studies > 1 > Harcourt

    The purple circle

    Geoff Harcourt

    Harcourt, Geoff 1999, 'The purple circle', Fremantle Studies, 1: 39-46.

    The subject of this paper is the development of a work culture at the Co-
    operative Bulk Handling (CBH) North Fremantle grain terminal. CBH is a
    grower owned and controlled co-operative that exports Western Australia’s grain
    crop.

    The North Fremantle culture evolved separately from the dominant CBH culture,
    which was built around patronage and reward. North Fremantle shared elements
    of waterfront working life such as the necessity to live close to the job, 1 the
    importance of solidarity and the almost arrogant sense of work pride, making the
    men feel that they were in charge of their own destiny.

    In both areas, the waterfront and the grain terminal, work was casual but with an
    element of security for those in a position to be picked up regularly. 2 For many
    men at the terminal this system suited them during Australia’s only sustained
    period of full employment, the post-war period from 1945 to the end of the
    1960s.

    Notwithstanding gradual changes in technology, elements of a work-and-bust
    lifestyle remained. Gambling and drinking were popular and affordable as good
    wages allowed for these indulgences. These practices were carried on quite
    openly.

    My involvement with CBH and the North Fremantle grain handlers began in
    1977 at the Kwinana grain terminal where the men had been transferred after the scaling-down of North Fremantle. Their refusal to handle excessively dirty,
    weevil-infested wheat at the new terminal caused CBH to hire casuals (of which
    I was one).

    I recognized a certain arrogance in the men’s actions and later came to
    understand that the key to their assertive nature lay somewhere in their cultural
    baggage. The evolution of this culture became the focus of a thesis, based largely
    upon the men’s own stories.

    Documenting workers’ experiences at North Fremantle was not simply a task of
    employing a tape recorder. The stories had to be set in a context and time frame.
    The validity and thoroughness of the information provided had to be assessed
    carefully. For example, those still employed in the industry found it difficult to
    speak about issues that might indict them or their workmates; then there was the
    problem of sifting out the legend from the truth or having to follow up two
    versions of the same event. In some cases, with a brief preface, they could both
    be cited as ‘fact’.

    Arbitration decisions and industrial awards formed a large part of the
    documentation used to highlight the development of a work culture at North
    Fremantle. Accounts of these are available in the Western Australian Industrial
    Gazette. However, where no formal hearing was held or where agreements were
    reached by consensus, only the results of those items were gazetted. The
    information therefore had to be supplemented by private sources. In this context
    the ‘Grain Handler’ files at the Fremantle Branch of the Maritime Union of
    Australia (formerly the Waterside Workers’ Federation), which now represents
    the Kwinana grain handlers, were most valuable.

    The terms of employment for grain handlers at North Fremantle before World
    War II and throughout the 1940s, 1950s and early 1960s were casual. A daily
    pick-up operated from what was commonly known as ‘the corner’. Despite the
    casual nature of the employment, preference was given to an inner core of
    regulars known as ‘the circle’. These men were, as an award provision, expected
    to ‘unless lawfully absent from the industry attend the daily pick-up regularly
    from day to day and accept employment provided by an employer’. 3 John
    Duggan explained that

    The circle consisted of a certain group of people who got picked up every day; they were permanent casuals. They got a job before anyone else … They never got a dirty job. 4

    While circle men were given status under the award, those outside were at the
    mercy of fluctuations in the industry. A group of semi-regulars or ‘untouchables’
    picked up any surplus left by the circle, while a third group of hopefuls - the
    ‘seagulls’- were so called because they had to accept any jobs that were left.
    They were mainly picked up only when conditions were busy. It was possible to
    move gradually through into the circle but, for some, that wait was not necessary.
    Much of the hiring was done on approval of influential people among the bosses
    and workers. Dave Barnes, a casual during the 1950s, recalled:

    Nugget Kitson and Geoff Currie virtually went straight into the circle because they had relations on staff. 6

    But both John Duggan and John Fuller became regulars at North Fremantle because of a word-of-mouth network. John Duggan explained:

    I was told there might be work at North Fremantle ... So I went over and positioned myself on the corner [the pick-up] and saw one of my old school mates. He said he would put in a word for me. 7

    And John Fuller recalled:

    I was only 16. I had two uncles working there. They told me casuals were being picked up. So I went over there and got picked up for a midnight shift ... Once I was there a few times they knew me as McCarthy’s nephew. 8

    But he was not always successful.

    Not being circle you [were] only picked up about half the time. It was fairly spasmodic for a couple of years. When you didn’t get a start at the silo you would go down to Paddy Troy’s corner — the Painters and Dockers. 9

    John Duggan’s early experiences highlight another important factor in the system
    ‘discipline’.

    After two days I upset an Agricultural Inspector. For a couple of days I didn’t get picked up so I approached the foreman. He told me that the Agricultural Inspector had put me in. He [the Foreman] had been told not to pick me up. 10

    John Fuller also recalls being ‘left’ on the comer for a few days once.

    We wanted to go to the Kalgoorlie races. We didn’t ask to be excused — we just went. When we got back a week or so later we didn’t get picked up. 11

    harcourt1

    Wheat stacker working in No 1 Annex, Nth Fremantle Grain Terminal, 1938. Note the primitive uprights which made it difficult to handle grain quickly and economically. Courtesy CBH

    On another occasion CBH suspended a casual hand from the pick-up for fighting
    on the job. Barney Johnson remembered such an occasion:

    Bert Morgan was left out in the cold for a week once for fighting ‘Willagee’ Joe Woodward — he [Joe] only got two days. Bert was annoyed and argued that [his week] was a bit stiff. He said ‘A bloody week! Come off it. I could smack a copper in the mouth and only get two days in the slammer and they’d have to feed me’. 12

    The rules were not quite so tight for circle men unless it was extremely busy. John Duggan explained that

    Some of the circle blokes would work all weekend and wouldn’t want to work Monday. When the foreman called out the names from his book someone would say ‘Washing day, Bill’. That would mean that the bloke wasn’t coming in. 13

    Replacements for those circle men who opted not to report to the comer after a
    weekend came from the untouchables, the group just outside the circle. Usually
    there were enough men to cover all the required positions but occasionally the
    company could be left short of labour.

    From the men’s point of view these arrangements broke down the number of
    hours worked. John Duggan claimed that this practice was popular because it
    allowed men to take time off in lieu of wages that would otherwise be taxed
    heavily, while also giving a battler a chance at a day’s wage. 14 The power of the
    circle was reinforced with activities like this as members indirectly dictated who
    worked in the industry. In addition, non-attendance after weekend work
    institutionalized a later award condition — the day in lieu of weekend overtime. 15

    The casual and seasonal mode of CBH was attractive to some shearers who lived
    in the Fremantle area. Barney Johnson, for example, was able to come home
    when the shearing sheds were cut out, have a short holiday, then pick up regular
    work at CBH.

    The foreman Bill Stansfield was an old shearer himself, so after the circle had been looked after he favoured blokes like me. This upset some of the circle men. Once I was given a circle man’s position because he hadn’t turned up, but when he arrived he ‘rolled’ me. Old Bill said to me ‘Sorry Barney’ and that name stuck to me. 16

    harcourt2

    Nth Fremantle Grain Terminal, late 1940s. The large horizontal storage sheds were used until the late 1960s when need for a greater storage capacity new technologies made them outdated. Courtesy CBH

    Shearers who had been union members were able to move freely between wool
    and wheat as both areas of work were covered by the Australian Workers’
    Union. Barney Johnson recalled how this happened in the pick-up at North
    Fremantle:

    I had always shorn union. I bought my ticket at the first shed I went to

    each year. That meant I was a walk-up start at CBH because my ticket
    was still valid when the work there picked up. 17

    During the season North Fremantle worked more or less around the clock. There
    was a midnight shift each night and a 14-hour day, except Saturday’s day shift
    was for the morning only because of races or football. 18

    The long hours worked meant that men earned big wages. While most men made
    themselves and their families financially secure there were elements of a ‘work
    and bust’ lifestyle. Gambling was popular: a two-up school was run every lunch
    time on pay day. John Duggan recalled:

    Cookie Mitchell and Billy Picket ran the two-up. One fellow used to do

    his pay. Once, after the new office was built, Ted Sherridin was
    cockatoo in case of a raid. There was a strange ute parked by the office.
    Ted lifted the tarpaulin and there were two bodies (hiding) under it. He
    slammed it down and raised the alarm. By the time the coppers got there
    the school had hidden. They got no one. They went to the office and
    told the boss his men were playing two-up and if he didn’t stop it they
    would arrest him.”

    harcourt3

    Nth Fremantle Grain Terminal, late 1940s. The large horizontal storage sheds were used until the late 1960s when need for a greater storage capacity new technologies made them outdated. Courtesy CBH

    The consumption of alcohol was also embedded in the culture that developed at
    the terminal throughout the 1950s and early 1960s. Not all the men indulged in
    the drinking but it was strong enough to become an accepted custom at North
    Fremantle. Some men would come to work under the influence of alcohol while
    a smaller number also brought beer or wine with them and drank during the meal
    breaks. 20

    The men who gambled and drank together formed a close-knit group that,
    despite these habits, worked hard and were able to keep the operations n1nning.2l
    It became apparent very early that under these circumstances as long as the job
    kept going without trouble the ‘bad habits’ of some men were overlooked.

    By the early 1960s a combination of the need to expand North Fremantle’s
    storage capacity and the need to supply a better product was beginning to impact
    upon CBH.” To overcome the difficulties of inadequate storage and guarantee of
    product, CBH opted to re-develop North Fremantle.

    The expansion of North Fremantle did not suit everyone, even though most of
    the circle men were offered permanent positions in the new silo. A number of
    long-serving men ignored the opportunity. Many men who had worked for CBH
    as casuals since the end of World War II were not interested in permanent jobs.
    Some of them had spent all their working lives as casual labourers and had come
    to accept the occasional uncertainty of the pick-up because they also enjoyed the
    freedom a casual status provided. Amongst these men were some who thought
    that the ability to earn good wages would disappear with the rigid work patterns
    that they believed permanency would bring. John Duggan recalled:

    A lot left because they thought they weren’t going to get the big money they had got in the past, or the hours didn’t suit them. 23

    Dave Barnes remembered some circle men refused the offer of permanency or
    wanted to revert to casual status after signing on as permanent hands.

    Cookie Mitchell and Billy Pickett got on as permanent but didn’t like it,
    so they resigned and went on the comer with us as casuals. A lot of us
    who got left out would have been glad to be put on as permanent.
    Johnny Fuller and I were left as casuals for two years before we got put
    on. 24

    When the new terminal was opened it was heralded as the dawn of a new era for
    CBH and rightly so, but it was also the closing of a chapter in its history. The
    plant was modern and much more of the working environment, it was suggested,
    would be cleaner. 25 Terms of employment under a new award offered
    permanency but this did not suit many of the old hands who enjoyed the freedom
    of a casual status. So, while the industry looked to bigger and better things, some
    of the workers looked back with more than a tinge of sadness.

    Presented at the Fremantle Studies Day
    22 June 1997, Fremantle Maritime Centre

    ENDNOTES

    1 For further information on living close to the job see Winifred Mitchell, ‘Home Life at the Hungry Mile: Sydney Wharf Labourers and their Families 1900 — 1914’. Labour History 33, 1977

    2 For accounts of the work arrangements see Wendy Lowenstein & Tom Hills, Under the Hook: Melbourne Waterside Workers Remember, Melbourne, 1982. See also Bryn Griffiths, Wharfies: A celebration of 100 years on the Fremantle waterfront 1889-1989, Platypus Press, Perth, 1989

    3 Western Australian Industrial Gazette 48, Award No 14, 1961 (hereafter WAIG), pp 13-14

    4 Interview with John Duggan, 14/7/91

    5 Interview with Dave Barnes, 28/8/91

    6 Ibid.

    7 Duggan interview

    8 Interview with John Fuller, 8/7/91

    9 Ibid.

    10 Duggan interview

    11 Fuller interview

    12 Interview with Barney Johnson, 28/8/91

    13 Duggan interview

    14 Ibid.

    15 North Fremantle Grain Terminal Award No 27, 1975, Clause 18, Overtime

    16 Johnson interview

    17 Ibid.

    18 WAIG 48, 1961, p 4

    19 Duggan interview

    20 Fuller interview

    21 Duggan interview

    22 Annual Report to Shareholders and Staff, 1961, CBH, Perth 1962, p 6

    23 Duggan interview

    24 Barnes interview

    25 CBH, Annual Report, 1961, p 6


    Freotopia

    This page incorporates material from Garry Gillard's Freotopia website, that he started in 2014 and the contents of which he donated to Wikimedia Australia in 2024. The content was originally created on 13 August, 2017 and hosted at freotopia.org/fhs/fs/1/Harcourt.html (it was last updated on 4 June, 2024), and has been edited since it was imported here (see page history). The donated data is also preserved in the Internet Archive's collection.